Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Review on supplements for weight loss

ABSTRACT: Successful treatment and prevention of overweight and obese cats and dogs require a multidimensional approach to ensure causes or exacerbating factors are identified and eliminated, professional examination and care are provided on a regular basis, and a comprehensive management program is planned and implemented. Over the years, many therapeutic and preventive interventions have been developed or advocated for obese animals, but evidence of effectiveness is often lacking or highly variable. Accordingly, the primary objective of the information reported here was to identify and critically appraise the evidence supporting various aspects of managing obese and overweight pet animals. (Roudebush P, Schoenherr WD, Delaney SJ. An evidence-based review of the use of nutraceuticals and dietary supplementation for the management of obese and overweight pets. JAVMA, Vol 232, No. 11, June 1, 2008)

COMMENTARY: This interesting review article assesses the evidence for various supplements that have been advocated for weight loss, and whether they might be useful in pets. The supplements are actually rated according to their supporting scientific evidence. The rating scale looks like this:

Grade I - Evidence obtained from at least 1 properly randomized, controlled clinical study that used the nutritional product in the target species (dogs, cats - not lab animals or people) with animals that had developed the disease naturally. Data published in peer-reviewed journals are preferred.

Grade II - Evidence obtained from randomized, controlled clinical studies conducted in a laboratory setting that used the nutritional product in the target species with animals that had developed the disease naturally. Data published in peer-reviewed journals are preferred.

Grade III - Evidence obtained from 1 or more of the following:
–At least 1 appropriately designed clinical study without randomization
–Cohort or case-controlled analytic studies
–Studies that used acceptable models of disease or simulations in the target species
–Case series
–Dramatic results from uncontrolled studies
Data published in peer-reviewed journals are preferred.

Grade IV - Evidence obtained from 1 or more of the following:
–Opinions based on clinical experience (textbooks, monographs, or proceedings)
–Descriptive studies
–Studies conducted in other species
–Pathophysiologic justification
–Reports of expert committees

Here is the report card for weight loss supplements:

Pyruvate: an unpublished grade II study in dogs found that pyruvate supplementation did NOT enhance weight or fat loss in overweight dogs consuming a low-fat food. There is no data in cats.

Omega 3 fatty acids: one unpublished grade II study suggests that increased consumption of
omega-3 fatty acids may be beneficial in overweight dogs on calorically restricted diets.

Amylase inhibitors (starch blockers): only a pathophysiologic rationale (ie, grade
IV evidence) exists to support use of compounds that delay carbohydrate absorption.

DHEA: grade II studies in obese dogs suggest that DHEA may be beneficial as part of a weight management program when used with calorie-restricted foods. DHEA is not recommended because of adverse effects, and newer, safer forms have not been tested in dogs or cats.

L-carnitine: grade I and II studies suggest that l-carnitine supplementation of weight management foods can benefit obese and obesity-prone cats and dogs.

Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA): seems to help reduce fat vs lean body weight in growing animals but there is little evidence that it is useful in weight loss programs for adults.

Phytoestrogens: results of Grade II studies indicate that genistein may help prevent obesity after neutering cats, and limited, unpublished data support the use of soy isoflavones for preventing weight gain in dogs.

Diacylglycerol: Grade II studies in dogs suggest that diacylglycerol may enhance fat loss.

Chromium: Grade II studies tend to show that chromium does not assist in weight loss for either dogs or cats.

Vitamin A: grade II studies indicate that vitamin A supplementation may help blunt increases in body weight in cats and dogs allowed ad lib consumption of high-fat foods.

Authors' conclusion: "On the basis of this grading system, the best evidence exists for use of dietary l-carnitine supplementation in obese or overweight pets, although many of the results for use of l-carnitine are described only in abstracts, industry publications, and patent applications, which makes it difficult to review experimental methods and data analysis. More research-based evidence is needed to support routine use of other nutraceuticals or dietary supplementation, with compounds such as pyruvate, amylase inhibitors, safer forms of DHEA, CLA, diacylglycerol, chromium, and vitamin A, for weight loss in pets.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Cool cat furniture

Cat cubbies, wall art that depends on cat interaction.....check out moderncat.net

http://www.moderncat.net/

Monday, January 12, 2009

For ravenous dogs who eat voraciously then look at you for more, here's one answer:

The “Eat Slow Bowl” from Greedy Pup
http://www.thekitchn.com/thekitchn/tabletop/for-furry-friends-the-eat-slow-bowl-from-greedy-pup-073531

I found another as well:
"Eat Slower Pet Dishes"
http://www.eatslowerpetdishes.com

Dietary supplements for dogs differ, depending on owners' income

ABSTRACT: The prevalence of feeding practices and supplements for dogs used in private practice (PP) and the non-profit-making People’s Dispensary for Sick Animals (PDSA) was evaluated. Questionnaires were completed by 400 PP clients and 400 PDSA clients, of which 27·2 per cent and 29·8 per cent, respectively, gave supplements to their dogs. Fatty acids/oils were given by 10·3 per cent of PP clients and 11·5 per cent of PDSA clients, glucosamine and/or chondroitin by 10·5 per cent and 5·8 per cent, and vitamins by 6·8 per cent and 19·3 per cent, respectively. The supplements were provided daily by 17·8 per cent of the PP clients and 14·3 per cent of the PDSA clients, and the PDSA clients were 50 per cent more likely to provide the supplements only weekly or monthly than the PP clients. A commercially available maintenance or dietetic diet was fed by 98·8 per cent of the PP clients and 94·2 per cent of the PDSA clients. (R. M. Thomson, J. Hammond, H. E. Ternent, P. S. Yam. Feeding practices and the use of supplements for dogs kept by owners in different socioeconomic groups. The Veterinary Record, November 22, 2008)

COMMENTARY: This study compared the supplementation practices of low income pet owners attending a 'free' veterinary clinic vs supplementation practices of owners attending a private practice. Interestingly, about the same percentage (almost 30% of owners) were supplementing their dogs' diet. However, the private practice clients were supplementing significantly more glucosamine and/or chondroitin, probiotics and fatty acids. The low income pet owners were giving vitamin supplements more than any other type, despite the fact that most of they were feeding complete and balanced diets.

Now, the suitability of commercial diets vs homemade aside, one thing that commercial diets do pretty well is to prevent vitamin and mineral deficiencies. Worse, these low income clients (most of whom were making less than $20,000 per year) would probably be better served by spending their few pounds on better commercial diets, or supplements that were better designed to make up for deficiencies in those diets, even if their dogs needed supplementation more than their families need other items.

Most studies of alternative medicine in developed countries has shown that those who take nutraceutical and herbal supplements are more educated, with higher incomes, than those who don't. In addition, these people seem to be self-treating more chronic disorders. This study seems to reflect that trend, in that the higher income owners are spending money on nutraceuticals targeting chronic problems. But then why are the lower income clients buying vitamin supplements? Really good advertising by those companies?

Sunday, January 11, 2009

First things first. Have you discovered Lolcats? If not, get thee to this website immediately: http://www.icanhascheezburger.com. And prepare to spend some time in those archives. I find myself weeping with laughter every time.